Why aren't tech folks as bothered by AI as creatives are?

[eLdavis]

For creatives, it took them months and if not years to be able to do what they can do, and this is how they feed. They offer their services for a fee. With the introduction of AI one can actually do these things within seconds and do not even need experience. Creatives are simply scared people might no longer need their services again in the long run.

 

[King Belieal]

The creatives are really worried that AI would render them irrelevant which is quite understandable. The tech folks are not bothered because AI would open new job opportunities for them. They can easily switch and work in AI related industry. The AI revolution even needs the tech guys more.

 

[saoussen5765]

As much as tech enthusiasts do not seem too bothered about AI at the moment, in time I do believe they will. AI is still very much in its early days and over time, we will see it progress and become a lot more clever.

Once they reach a time where AI can do something that tech enthusiasts can in which it can not do now, that is when I feel they will start panicking.

AI could not replace humans for teaching. Student could have tricky questions that AI fail to respond or respond with wrong manner.

 

[NinjaCatXy]

Here’s my thought on this while I’m fairly certain that @Ses8me486 is pretty close to bang on but it is a bit deeper even. Have you ever heard a computer programmer who was able to complete a full code project without in one go without any headaches and bugs along the way where now using ai they can take all the grunt work out of it and if they understand the parts and pieces they just need to ask for it copy paste it run it check it ask for it to debug its own work etc? I am not a coder and I with the help of chat gpt coded a working small program that would fetch information about and give a summary of a user entered subject from Wikipedia And it worked. It’s as far as I got becasue I didn’t even understand where to go next with it but anytime this code didn’t work I would just copy paste it back into chat gpt and say it didn’t work then it would say oh there seems to be “this” problem and would then fix it and the next code usualaly worked.but even before ai coding could definitely be learned by anyone willing to put in the work and but I dare to say no one really “enjoys the process” or finds themselves absorbed by the process in a way that it becomes like a part of them. However with art . An Artist is inspired and then uses our bodies to create the physical visual representation of that inspiration and was something that was limited to a select few humans . While I do not agree many people don’t think the ability todo this can be taught or learned they think u were born with it or not..but the most important Point is we usually kinda enjoy the journey and the errors while annoying can sometimes be worked into the art work if you are a skilled artist may not even be noticed but is still part of the journey the creation took them on And we used to be sought out to help create the physical visual representation of non artistic humans inspirations also. But we feel like our art are extensions of our souls and ai do not have souls so it’s very hard to see what they make being the same as what we do. But people who were not artists are willing to give this job to unsouled ai and that is why we feel kinda offended by it. If it were a tool that normal people would still need us artists to use ( like the everyday person still would kinda struggle a little to use ai to program) it might be less offensive. Tbh I love to use it to give me jump off points or speed up the process of the first drafts then work my own magic on top with digital art I have always felt that there is more copy pasting of things than drawing happening a lot but it is still an artist who blends or bends and puts the parts where it has the wanted effect And I think creativity was one thing we never thought a machine would be able to duplicate ….. idk. But I feel very on the fense with it myself