Over the last year, a lot of developer tooling around AI has focused on improving single-prompt interactions with increasingly capable models. That works well for isolated tasks, but it seems to break down once you move into more realistic workflows — debugging, code review, security analysis, or multi-step reasoning where consistency and traceability matter.
One challenge we’ve repeatedly run into is that once multiple models are involved (for example, comparing outputs, validating reasoning, or running follow-up checks), the system starts to look less like “chat” and more like a distributed workflow:
In practice, most off-the-shelf tools still treat these interactions as ephemeral conversations. That makes it difficult to answer questions like:
We ended up experimenting with more structured approaches internally — defining explicit steps, assigning responsibilities to different roles or models, and keeping execution traces so the workflow could be inspected later. That helped, but it also raised new questions around complexity, overhead, and how much structure is “too much” for developers who just want things to work.
I’m curious how others here are approaching this if you are interested you can visit AutomatosX to explore more on github:
Interested in hearing what’s working (or not) for people who’ve run into similar problems.
One challenge we’ve repeatedly run into is that once multiple models are involved (for example, comparing outputs, validating reasoning, or running follow-up checks), the system starts to look less like “chat” and more like a distributed workflow:
- Multiple agents or roles performing specialized steps
- Reusable task patterns rather than ad-hoc prompts
- The need to reproduce results days or weeks later
- Some form of audit trail for why a decision was made
In practice, most off-the-shelf tools still treat these interactions as ephemeral conversations. That makes it difficult to answer questions like:
- What exact inputs led to this output?
- Which model or step introduced an error?
- Can this process be rerun or validated independently?
We ended up experimenting with more structured approaches internally — defining explicit steps, assigning responsibilities to different roles or models, and keeping execution traces so the workflow could be inspected later. That helped, but it also raised new questions around complexity, overhead, and how much structure is “too much” for developers who just want things to work.
I’m curious how others here are approaching this if you are interested you can visit AutomatosX to explore more on github:
- Are you still relying primarily on single-model chat flows?
- Have you built or adopted systems for multi-step or multi-model reasoning?
- How do you handle reproducibility, debugging, or auditing when AI is part of the pipeline?
- At what point does orchestration become more trouble than it’s worth?
Interested in hearing what’s working (or not) for people who’ve run into similar problems.