Welcome to AI Forums – the premier online community for AI enthusiasts! Explore discussions on AI tools, ChatGPT, GPTs, and AI in entrepreneurship. Connect, share insights, and stay updated with the latest in AI technology.
Hi everyone,
I’m building Vectoralix, a managed platform for creating, testing, publishing and operating Model Context Protocol servers.
The idea came from a problem I kept running into while working with AI tools: the model is rarely the only limitation. The useful knowledge is usually...
I would measure the boring things: hours saved, fewer errors and how often a human has to redo the result. If those numbers do not improve, the impressive AI demo probably has little real value.
The funniest ones are when a normal technical word like “kill” or “terminate” gets interpreted literally. It is amusing in a chat, but much less amusing when the model is part of an automated workflow.
For me, the biggest benefit is removing repetitive work rather than replacing anyone. Even simple things like summarizing documents, preparing drafts and organizing tasks can save a surprising amount of time.
The biggest change for me has been separating planning from execution.
Previously, I would describe a task and immediately ask the model to generate code. Now I first ask it to inspect the requirements and relevant project context, then create an ADR or implementation plan. A developer reviews...
I see the biggest problems at the boundary between execution and judgment.
AI can extract information, call an API or generate code fairly well when the rules are explicit. It struggles when the business rules exist only in someone’s head, the data is inconsistent, or nobody has clearly defined...
I think it depends heavily on the type of work.
For long technical documents, software architecture, repository analysis and implementation planning, Claude is still one of the tools I use most often. It is especially useful when it receives enough project context instead of just a short...
Claude has probably made the biggest difference for me, especially for software planning and code review.
I try not to start by asking it to write an entire feature. I first give it the task and relevant project context, then ask it to produce an implementation plan or ADR. After I review the...