That's true. When you read a Chat GPT generated text, you would just understand that it was done by a robot. It would attempt to introduce in the first part, do an outline and explain in the second part. In the third part, it would summarise the outline. And that's the end of Chat GPT content...

I have not seen all these extensions since it changed to Gemini. Seems they are trying to focus on core functionality for the mean time. I prefer to use official extensions though and I would wait for Google to integrate them into Gemini.

Bard is elaborate in it's responses by default. For Chat GPT, it always gives condensed information at first prompt. You would have to prompt it to give you the details. That's why I love Bard because I am a heavy writer.

The real difference between Google Gemini and other AI products offered by Google is that Gemini is multi modal. That's a unique selling point it has over even Chat GPT. Gemini can offer language analysis services on photos, texts and audio.

I think that the easiest way to provide suggestions and feedbacks to Gemini is to engage with the posts of their umbrella company, Google AI on X. That has proven to always be easily noticed by the handlers of the platform. Or you can use the Google AI community.

Why people are scared of advancements in AI technology is because it is hard to regulate AI. It is not clearly defined what constitutes AI and the development of AI is so fast paced that it is difficult to define the boundaries before another level comes up.

They wanted to integrate the underlying technology behind Bard accross different of their platforms, having a specific name reflective of the engine helped branding purpose. So now, you don't need to have Bard as a separate entity from Gemini when it is the same technology that is used accross...

One strength that Bard, now Gemini has is the ability to do condensed version of texts. I have used it to create a 200 word summary of a 500 page write up. It delivered excellently without any fuss.

Bard now Gemini released a mobile app for Android and iOS quite recently. I think it was released just this month. The app is available as a standalone app on playstore and an extension on the Google Tab on iOS.

I have not actively used Claude but people who have say that it is very strong in offering elaborate explanations to uploaded texts. If you are handling a bit of scientific and technical project and you need clarity, Claude is definitely the best AI tool.

If the owner of the site or job wanted AI contents, he or she would have done it himself. If I am supervising and you bring AI generated contents for me to assess and grade, I would give you an absolute zero for that work.

The real problem when AI system fails and causes damages is to determine who rightly takes the fall for it. That's because sometimes, we would easily blame the company when the user is truly at fault for the AI system failure. While the regulatory landscape for AI is still evolving, there are...

In my circle, the most talked about AIs were those that could use texts descriptions to generate videos. And the tools that were prominent with these were RunwayML's Gen-2: Just describe a scene, character and how you want the camera movement and this tool would generate a video for you. 2)...

I don't know if I live in a different planet but I find Bard better than ChatGPT. At first prompt, Bard is detailed with responses to queries. At first prompt, Chat GPT always seems like it wants to hoard some details. Same queries, same formats to the two of Bard and ChatGPT. Bard would take...

I feel the integration with YouTube was always going to have issues since it was not a native integration. Bard's integration with YouTube is rock solid. The analysis of YouTube videos from Bard is rock solid. I still think that's the point that Bard beats ChatGPT.

Introducing my mom to Chat GPT is a complete waste of time. She doesn't have anything to do with AIs. My dad is a little bit tech savvy. He is a literature teacher and he was very appreciative when I introduced Chat GPT and Bard to him. He uses it to prepare his lesson notes and analyse their...

I think Google for the first time were taken unawares by a tech revolution when Open AI launched Chat GPT. They had to hurriedly put up a response with the Gemini that powers Bard. I trust Google to work on improving Bard as time goes on. For Bard having a specialised app, I am still in the...

If Bard can analyse videos and draw out commentaries, summary and themes from it. Yes. I have personally used Bard to to that. How difficult would it be for it to handle any length of text. I assure you that Bard would handle this very perfectly. I think this is basic for an LLM.

I have not used Bing though but I know that Bard is slower than ChatGPT in generating information for queries. But if you all are complaining about Bard not being able to generate and compile information from it's subsidiary search engine, what would you make of ChatGPT whose knowledge base is...

I believe that as this year progresses, we would have language models being able to generate code scripts based on natural language description. That is to say a user would just describe how his intended software should behave. The AI should be able to use that description to generate a code...