Honestly, the 30% mother's blessing experience feels a bit excessive when combined with everything else. With three characters at level 100 and one at 95, the grind for level 15 glyphs in nightmare dungeons continues. While one could argue that nightmare glyphs may be the outlier, instant access...

Did they make changes? It used to generate useless content, and then it stopped. Now, it's back and producing useless content better than ever.

I've noticed Bard struggles to fetch timely information from Google searches, unlike Microsoft Bing. Despite being a Google product, Bard seems less adept in certain situations. What could be causing this issue?

Fascinating discovery! Could you elaborate on your testing methods? Providing a concrete example would help us better understand the context and implications.

Feeding Bard large texts to summarize could help it learn. But can it process multi-page forum threads? It would be useful if Bard could ingest long discussions and categorize opinions by each commenter. This could allow for quick topical overview versus reading pages of back-and-forth posts...

The Bard interface doesn't work well on Mobile Safari - the text scrolls side to side instead of staying centered. This makes it really difficult to read long conversations on an iPhone. Hopefully Google can improve the mobile optimization soon so Bard is easily usable across devices. Smooth...

Unfortunately, Bard still lacks persistent sessions and needs reloading. Also, the mobile experience feels clunky, with awkward page scrolling. seamless cross-device functionality is really needed.

Bard impresses in early testing - conversations feel smoother vs ChatGPT 3.5. Google is making strides. But GPT-4 will raise the bar later this year. While improved, Bard still struggles with consistency, accuracy, and complex prompts. There's clear potential, but gaps remain vs GPT-4's aims...

Google's AI demos have failed to deliver in the past. So Bard's slick reveal felt familiar - flashy but headed for vaporware? I want quality ChatGPT alternatives, but so far none match its capabilities. Bard may get there eventually with Google's resources. But until real-world performance...

I rarely encounter censorship issues with AI. Browsing the subs, you'd think censorship was rampant based on frequent complaint posts. But in my experience across multiple mainstream AI models, filtering has been quite reasonable - detecting only clear harmful content. The fears seem overblown...

Absolutely stoked that you're vibing with ChromeOS love! Happy to spread the joy - I can drop the deets on the process or even toss it on GitHub. Just let me know where you want the backstage pass!

Distinguishing between AI-generated and real images is becoming a real head-scratcher. The details - hands, eyes, even hairs - are getting scarily accurate. In the mid-journey of this tech evolution, some images are so convincingly "real." Sure, you might spot a few things here and there, but...

Which AI apps/tools do you use religiously, like on a weekly or daily basis? Specifically interested in ones tailored for non-technical users, and bonus points if they're out of the experimental phase. Personally, I'm into ChatGPT, Midjourney, and Claude AI.

To grant ChatGPT API access to constantly updating information from third-party APIs, consider building a middleware system. Use a programming language like Python, set up scheduled tasks to fetch data from APIs, and store it locally. Then, create an API endpoint for ChatGPT to query the updated...

Well, for manual testing of endpoints like text-to-speech (TTS), consider using tools like Postman or cURL. They allow you to send HTTP requests and examine responses easily. Ensure you have the necessary API keys and documentation. Also, explore the available parameters for customization.